Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 135-144, May 2009

Dominance in domestic dogs—useful construct or bad habit?

  • John W.S. Bradshaw

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprint requests and correspondence: John Bradshaw, Reader in Companion Animal Behaviour, University of Bristol, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, Langford, North Somerset, BS40 5DU, UK; Phone: +44 117 928 9673: Fax +44 117 928 9582
  • ,
  • Emily J. Blackwell
  • ,
  • Rachel A. Casey

Anthrozoology Institute, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, North Somerset, United Kingdom

Abstract 

The term “dominance” is widely used in the academic and popular literature on the behavior of domestic dogs, especially in the context of aggression. Although dominance is correctly a property of relationships, it has been erroneously used to describe a supposed trait of individual dogs, even though there is little evidence that such a trait exists. When used correctly to describe a relationship between 2 individuals, it tends to be misapplied as a motivation for social interactions, rather than simply a quality of that relationship. Hence, it is commonly suggested that a desire ‘to be dominant’ actually drives behavior, especially aggression, in the domestic dog. By contrast, many recent studies of wolf packs have questioned whether there is any direct correspondence between dominance within a relationship and agonistic behavior, and in contrast to wolves, hierarchical social structures have little relationship with reproductive behavior in feral dog packs. Nor do the exchanges of aggressive and submissive behavior in feral dogs, originally published by S. K. Pal and coworkers, fit the pattern predicted from wolf behavior, especially the submissive behavior observed between members of different packs. In the present study of a freely interacting group of neutered male domestic dogs, pairwise relationships were evident, but no overall hierarchy could be detected. Since there seems to be little empirical basis for wolf-type dominance hierarchies in dogs, the authors have examined alternative constructs. Parker's Resource Holding Potential (RHP) appears to be less useful when applied to domestic dogs than to other species, although it has the advantage of incorporating the concept of subjective resource value (V) as a factor influencing whether or not conflicts are escalated. The authors propose that associative learning, combined with V, can provide more parsimonious explanations for agonistic behavior in dogs than can the traditional concept of dominance.

Key words: domestic dog, wolf, dominance, aggression, resource holding potential

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1558-7878(08)00115-9

doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2008.08.004

Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 135-144, May 2009