Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 229-239, September 2008

Is dietary choice important to animal welfare?

  • Xavier Manteca, DVM, MSc, PhD, ECVBM-CA

      Affiliations

    • School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprint requests and correspondence: Xavier Manteca, School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain; Phone: + 34 93 581 16 47; Fax: + 34 93 581 20 06.
  • ,
  • Juan J. Villalba, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
  • ,
  • Sheldon B. Atwood, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
  • ,
  • Luthando Dziba, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
  • ,
  • Frederick D. Provenza, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah

Accepted 27 May 2008.

Abstract 

Scientific interest in farm animal welfare has grown rapidly in recent years because consumers increasingly demand that farm animals are reared, transported, and slaughtered in a humane way. Additionally, nutrition emerges as an important aspect of welfare since in most codes of recommendations for the welfare of animals, adequate nutrition is one of the primary requirements to be satisfied. We submit that in many cases domestic animals are provided with diets that, even when abundant and nutritious, are not necessarily adequate to foster the welfare of animals. The monotonous diets fed in confinement (total mixed rations) and on pasture (monocultures) often contain excesses of nutrients, nutrient imbalances, and toxins that adversely influence animal welfare. How much of any food an animal can eat will depend on the other foods it consumes, because at the biochemical level, nutrients and toxins interact one with another—nutrients with nutrients, nutrients with toxins, and toxins with toxins. Food intake and preference also depend on differences in how individual animals are built morphologically and how they function physiologically, and marked variation is common even among closely related animals relative to the needs for nutrients and tolerance to toxins. An integral part of an animal's ability to meet its particular nutritional requirements and consume substances that improve health depends on having a variety of foods available so each animal can select a diet that best meets its homeostatic needs. Food choice may also offer animals a means to cope with toxins, as certain food combinations have the potential to ameliorate the negative effects of toxins. We suggest that the availability of alternatives may not only contribute to maintain homeostasis but also reduce levels of stress. Thus, food choice is necessary for individual animals to have freedom to express their normal behaviors. We contend this freedom enables the uniqueness of individuals to be manifest, thereby promoting animal welfare and performance and increasing profitability of the people who manage animals.

Keywords: diet choice, nutrition, welfare

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1558-7878(08)00094-4

doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2008.05.005

Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 229-239, September 2008