Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 104-113, May 2008

Survey of undesirable behaviors displayed by potential guide dogs with puppy walkers

  • Angelo Gazzano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2- 56124 Pisa, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprint requests and correspondence: Angelo Gazzano, Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2- 56124 Pisa (Italy).
  • ,
  • Chiara Mariti

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2- 56124 Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Claudio Sighieri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2- 56124 Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Michele Ducci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Biochemistry and Physiology, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2- 56124 Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Carlo Ciceroni

      Affiliations

    • Veterinary and Urban Health, Local Sanitary Enterprise 10, Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Anne McBride

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Southampton, United Kingdom

Abstract 

This research aimed to identify the frequency and type of undesirable behaviors observed by guide dog puppy walkers and management strategies used by them during the puppy-walking period.

All members of 36 puppy-walking families (N = 96), recruited from the National School of Guide Dogs for Blind People in Florence (Italy), completed an 80-item questionnaire. This sampling represented homes caring for 28 Labrador retrievers, 6 Golden retrievers, and 2 German shepherd dogs. Of these dogs, 47.2% (n = 17) were males and 52.8% (n = 19) females, and 66.7% (n = 24) were between 7 and 12 months old.

Three categories of undesirable behaviors were recorded. First, behaviors considered inconsequential to the guide dog role were: digging (11.8%, n = 11); chewing objects (4.4%, n = 4); stealing or begging for food (3.1%, n = 3); licking people (5.9%, n = 5); getting on furniture (4.4% n = 4); defending territory (2.8%, n = 2); and coprophagia (5.9%, n = 5). Second, the following behaviors considered easily resolvable through training were recorded: lack of recall (8.9%, n = 10); pulling on lead (11.8%, n = 11); jumping up (28.1%, n = 30); barking at other dogs (5.9%, n = 5); chewing the leash (1.5%, n = 1); and house soiling (5.9% (n = 5). Third, these potentially disqualifying behaviors were observed: scavenging (17.7%, n = 17); aggressive barking, growling, and biting (10.4%, n = 10); and fear of thunderstorms (6.2%, n = 6); loud noises (32.3%, n = 31); men (2.1%, n = 2); women (3.1%, n = 3); and people with unusual clothes (6.2%, n = 6). None of the puppies was reported to be fearful of children.

Overall, 67.7% (n = 66) of respondents recorded at least 1 undesirable behavior. However, only few of them might lead to disqualification. The results suggest that most of the puppies were well socialized to people and not fearful.

Puppy walkers could contribute to the early assessment of potential behavioral problems, which are a major cause of disqualifying guide dogs.

Keywords: guide dogs, puppy walkers, questionnaire, undesirable behaviour

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1558-7878(08)00077-4

doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2008.04.002

Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 104-113, May 2008