Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 75-79, September 2006

A Note on Estrous Response in Cows Induced With or Without the Application of Estrogens, and Their Effect in Nontreated Herdmates

  • Paolo H. Fetter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico D.F., Mexico
  • ,
  • Carlos S. Galina, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico D.F., Mexico
  • ,
  • Angel R. Pulido, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center of Teaching, Research, and Extension in Tropical Livestock, Martinez de la Torre, Veracruz, Mexico
  • ,
  • Agustin Orihuela, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Agriculture and Livestock Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: Agustin Orihuela, Faculty of Agriculture and Livestock Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa Cuernavaca, Mor., 62210, México.
  • ,
  • Martin Maquivar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico D.F., Mexico

Abstract 

To determine if providing estrogen with a control internal drug (progesterone) releasing device (CIDR) increases the number of cows showing estrus but not ovulating, and if there is synchronization of estrus in nontreated cows, 54 Brahman cows with no calf present were synchronized sequentially with CIDR on days 1, 7, 13, and 22. The numbers of cows treated on each of the 4 days were 4, 6, 10, and 7, respectively. These animals did not receive an estrogen injection (CON) on day 3, 10, 16, and 22. A set of matching animals was synchronized with CIDR but given an injection of 1.0 mg of estradiol benzoate 24 hours after implant withdrawal (EB). Ultrasound examinations and blood samples were taken on the day of CIDR implant, on the day of withdrawal, and 10 days following the average response time to estrus in the experimental group. Of the EB and CON cows, 81% (22/27) and 48% (13/27), respectively, displayed estrous behavior after implant withdrawal. The number of animals displaying estrus and ovulating was similar (10 and 12, respectively) for EB and CON cows. However, more cows (P=0.02) showed estrus but did not ovulate in the EB group (n=12) than in the CON group (n=1). Onset of estrus was different (P=0.05), averaging 43 ± 7 hours and 48 ± 8 hours for the EB and CON group, respectively. No differences were found in estrus intensity and length. There was a tendency for cows to form sexually active groups irrespective of the day of treatment, and this grouping behavior was even more evident as the experiment unfolded and the number of treated cows increased. There was a significant difference (P<0.05) in favor of CON cows in the display of estrus simultaneously with other cows in comparison with EB cows. It was concluded that cattle synchronized in alternation are capable of displaying behavioral estrus, but some do not ovulate following this event.

Keywords:  allomimetic behavior , estrus detection , estrous behavior , ovulation , cattle

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1558-7878(06)00071-2

doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2006.08.001

Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 75-79, September 2006